yes, you're very right.
Hrvoje Niksic wrote:
Ben Wing <ben(a)666.com> writes:
> b. a string dirty bit. If someone thinks we should actually *allow* the string
> to be modified during the mapping, then we can deal with this
> situation with a string dirty bit, which is set whenever a
> modification to the string happens.
This already exists, and is called "string modified tick". So this
solution doesn't require any additional work AFAIK.
In order to save my hands, I am cutting back on my responses, especially
to XEmacs-related mail. You _will_ get a response, but please be patient.
If you need an immediate response and it is not apparent in your message,
please say so. Thanks for your understanding.