7:54 p.m.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hey there everyone.
I have just added the following packages to the 'Pre-Releases'
directory:
New Packages in Pre-Release:
===========================
ispell-1.27-pkg.tar.gz upstream version: 3.3
Previously Announced Packages Still in Pre-Release:
==================================================
auctex-1.36-pkg.tar.gz upstream version: 11.13
cc-mode-1.42-pkg.tar.gz upstream version: 5.30.8
ecb-1.14-pkg.tar.gz upstream version: 2.11
ecrypto-0.15-pkg.tar.gz upstream version: 2.0
erc-0.02-pkg.tar.gz upstream version: Version 4.0 Revision: 1.584
fsf-compat-1.14-pkg.tar.gz upstream version: none
gnus-1.75-pkg.tar.gz upstream version: 5.10.2
hyperbole-1.14-pkg.tar.gz upstream version: 4.18
mail-lib-1.64-pkg.tar.gz upstream version: none
mh-e-1.28-pkg.tar.gz upstream version: 7.4.2
mule-base-1.45-pkg.tar.gz upstream version: none
net-utils-1.35-pkg.tar.gz upstream version: N/A
prog-modes-1.92-pkg.tar.gz upstream version: none
psgml-1.42-pkg.tar.gz upstream version: 1.3.1
riece-1.14-pkg.tar.gz upstream version: 0.1.7
sml-mode-0.11-pkg.tar.gz upstream version: 3.9.5
text-modes-1.72-pkg.tar.gz upstream version: none
tramp-1.17-pkg.tar.gz upstream version: 2.0.35
x-symbol-1.09-pkg.tar.gz upstream version: 4.5.1
xemacs-base-1.83-pkg.tar.gz upstream version: none
Detailed Changes:
================
- ------- ChangeLog Entries from xemacs-packages/ispell/ChangeLog -------
2003-12-30 Norbert Koch <viteno(a)xemacs.org>
* Makefile (VERSION): XEmacs package 1.27 released.
2003-12-20 Jerry James <james(a)xemacs.org>
* ispell.el: Upgrade to version 3.6 from Ken Stevens
<k.stevens(a)ieee.org>.
Installing These:
================
Manually:
- --------
1) Download the packages that you want to install from:
/ftp.xemacs.org:/pub/xemacs/beta/experimental/packages/
2) Unpack them to: [1]
/usr/local/lib/xemacs/xemacs-packages/
3) Re-start XEmacs.
Using XEmacs Package Tools (XEmacs 21.[245].x):
- ----------------------------------------------
1) Tools -> Packages -> Add Download Site -> Pre-Releases
2) Tools -> Packages -> List and Install
3) Select the packages you wish to install (there are brief
instructions at the bottom of the packages buffer).
4) Packages -> Install/Remove Selected
5) Re-start XEmacs.
Using XEmacs Package Tools (XEmacs 21.1.14):
- -------------------------------------------
1) Options -> Manage Packages -> Add Download Site -> Pre-Releases
2) Options -> Manage Packages -> List and Install
3 - 5) As per XEmacs 21.[245].x.
norbert - XEmacs Package Release Manager.
Footnotes:
[1] Note: Mule packages should be installed into:
/usr/local/lib/xemacs/mule-packages/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (FreeBSD)
iD8DBQE/8dgNgu3ywdHdhM0RAsXjAJ42SGkg66siN5XJxmxJBq6b1ne6BACePKsU
m2F+yHkUhSSb3zyabyV/gOw=
=p4Zr
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
9:55 p.m.
Norbert Koch <viteno(a)xemacs.org> wrote:
ispell-1.27-pkg.tar.gz upstream version: 3.3
Drat, I was afraid that would happen. I guess I should have
_underlined_ the sentence where I said that I did *not* bump
AUTHOR_VERSION in the Makefile. This is actually upstream version 3.6;
3.3 is what we had before.
--
Jerry James
http://www.ittc.ku.edu/~james/
11:39 a.m.
Jerry James <james(a)xemacs.org> writes:
Hi Jerry!
Norbert Koch <viteno(a)xemacs.org> wrote:
> ispell-1.27-pkg.tar.gz upstream version: 3.3
Drat, I was afraid that would happen. I guess I should have
_underlined_ the sentence where I said that I did *not* bump
AUTHOR_VERSION in the Makefile. This is actually upstream version 3.6;
3.3 is what we had before.
Uh, my bad, I didn't look close enough. But that's not really a
problem, we've got plenty of numbers to spare and a new release is
made in a couple of minutes :-)
norbert.
6:35 p.m.
Norbert Koch <viteno(a)xemacs.org> wrote:
Uh, my bad, I didn't look close enough. But that's not
really a
problem, we've got plenty of numbers to spare and a new release is
made in a couple of minutes :-)
Well, it was probably my bad for not just bumping it myself. I wasn't
sure what the convention was. And I wouldn't be so complacent about
having plenty of numbers if I were you. Phil on sci.math says that
there are only a finite number of natural numbers. We might run out!
:-)
--
Jerry James
http://www.ittc.ku.edu/~james/
12:44 a.m.
>>>> "Jerry" == Jerry James
<james(a)xemacs.org> writes:
Jerry> Phil on sci.math says that there are only a finite number
Jerry> of natural numbers. We might run out!
Not to worry. That's recent Alabama legislation but Norbert doesn't
live in Alabama.
Now, if Schwarzenegger decides to push for it in California (to
improve the math skills of 5th-graders, at least relative to the case
where they have to deal with an infinite number of natural numbers) we
could be in trouble.
On the other hand, I have complete confidence that the Danes will have
no problem with allowing us to use (and redistribute) _un_natural
(positive) integers. Thank you again, SunSITE!
Happy New Year, all!
--
Institute of Policy and Planning Sciences http://turnbull.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp
University of Tsukuba Tennodai 1-1-1 Tsukuba 305-8573 JAPAN
Ask not how you can "do" free software business;
ask what your business can "do for" free software.
1:23 a.m.
>>>>>"Jerry" == Jerry James
<james(a)xemacs.org> writes:
Jerry> Phil on sci.math says that there are
only a finite number
Jerry> of natural numbers. We might run out!
Would somebody care to explain that to me. How on earth can there be
a finite number of numbers?
--
|---<Steve Youngs>---------------<GnuPG KeyID: A94B3003>---|
| XEmacs - The only _______ you'll ever need. |
| Fill in the blank, yes, it's THAT good! |
|------------------------------<sryoungs(a)bigpond.net.au>---|
1:46 a.m.
Talk about off-topic! :-)
Steve Youngs <sryoungs(a)bigpond.net.au> wrote:
>>>>>>"Jerry" == Jerry James
<james(a)xemacs.org> writes:
Jerry> Phil on sci.math says that there are only a finite number
Jerry> of natural numbers. We might run out!
Would somebody care to explain that to me. How on earth can there be
a finite number of numbers?
First, note that I did not say that Phil on sci.math is either
intelligent or that he knows what he is talking about. :-) His argument
is something like "every natural number is finite, therefore there must
be a finite number of them, because otherwise there would be infinite
natural numbers." He's even taken to writing things like 111...oo...111
(where the "oo" is a poor man's representation of the infinity symbol)
to represent such "infinite natural numbers".
Just be glad he isn't developing XEmacs code. :-)
--
Jerry James, who has proved various cardinality properties of infinite
sets with PVS
2:45 a.m.
|--==> "JJ" == Jerry James <james(a)xemacs.org> writes:
JJ> Talk about off-topic! :-)
That's OK, the last line of your post puts it on-topic. :-)
JJ> First, note that I did not say that Phil on sci.math is either
JJ> intelligent or that he knows what he is talking about. :-)
Seems he likes to prove it too. :-)
[...]
JJ> Just be glad he isn't developing XEmacs code. :-)
He could probably land himself a job in Redmond though. :-P
--
|---<Steve Youngs>---------------<GnuPG KeyID: A94B3003>---|
| XEmacs - The only _______ you'll ever need. |
| Fill in the blank, yes, it's THAT good! |
|------------------------------<sryoungs(a)bigpond.net.au>---|
7414
days inactive
7423
days old
7 comments
4 participants
participants (4)
-
Jerry James -
Norbert Koch -
Stephen J. Turnbull -
Steve Youngs