>>>>> Karl M Hegbloom writes: > I just learned that there's a new version of `pcl-cvs' available. (2.9.x)

Can you send me patches? I'll check it in myself. If I just need to apply a (even large) patch set, it would make life easier for myself.

From: Charles G Waldman <cgw(a)fnal.gov&gt; Message-ID: <14412.102.751331.404697(a)buffalo.fnal.gov&gt; Date: Mon, 6 Dec 1999 12:28:54 -0600 (CST) To: Jan Vroonhof <vroonhof(a)math.ethz.ch&gt; Cc: Charles G Waldman <cgw(a)fnal.gov&gt;, xemacs-beta(a)xemacs.org Subject: Re: status of PCL-CVS Jan Vroonhof writes: > Charles G Waldman <cgw(a)fnal.gov&gt; writes: > > > Is anybody interested in syncing up our package with the latest > > PCL-CVS version? > > Greg Glander man said he was planning to do it, but didn't find the > time yet. Maybe you can offer to help him. > The reason I asked is that back in September I posted a patch http://www.xemacs.org/list-archives/xemacs-beta/9909/msg00376.html which is all that's needed to get pcl-cvs-2.9.7 to work with XEmacs. I also cc'd this message to the pcl-cvs mailing list. Not having gotten any feedback, I was starting to wonder if maybe I was the only one interested in this!