Re: [Success] XEmacs 21.4.14 "Reasonable Discussion", i586-pc-linux
- First Post
- Replies
- Stats
-
Go to
- ----- 2024 -----
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2023 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2022 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2021 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2020 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2019 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2018 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2017 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2016 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2015 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2014 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2013 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2012 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2011 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2010 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2009 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2008 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2007 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2006 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2005 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2004 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2003 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2002 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2001 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2000 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 1999 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 1998 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
>>>> "SY" == Steve Youngs
<youngs(a)xemacs.org> writes:
APA> I'll send a defcustom update for build-report soon.
SY> Wouldn't you be better off poking your nose into
SY> test-harness.el? What I'm finding annoying is that I have to
SY> do a search for '%)' in the make check compilation buffer to
SY> see if everything passed.
He already did, that's why this is happening. I QUERY'd the patch,
he said he wanted to do it anyway. If you want to VETO it, I'll back
you up. Dunno what Vin will do, since it's already in 21.4.
--
Institute of Policy and Planning Sciences http://turnbull.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp
University of Tsukuba Tennodai 1-1-1 Tsukuba 305-8573 JAPAN
Ask not how you can "do" free software business;
ask what your business can "do for" free software.
Steve Youngs
Monday, 22 September
Mon, 22 Sep
10:36 a.m.
New subject: [Success] XEmacs 21.4.14 "Reasonable Discussion", i586-pc-linux
|--==> "SJT" == Stephen J Turnbull <stephen(a)xemacs.org> writes:
>>>>>"SY" == Steve Youngs
<youngs(a)xemacs.org> writes:
SY> Wouldn't you be better off poking
your nose into
SY> test-harness.el? What I'm finding annoying is that I have to
SY> do a search for '%)' in the make check compilation buffer to
SY> see if everything passed.
SJT> He already did, that's why this is happening. I QUERY'd the patch,
SJT> he said he wanted to do it anyway. If you want to VETO it, I'll back
SJT> you up. Dunno what Vin will do, since it's already in 21.4.
Yeah, I remember that. I don't think the patch needs to be vetoed,
but I do think that the output from 'make check' needs to be improved.
What I'd like to see at the bottom of a 'make check' compilation
buffer would be something like:
,----
| base64-tests.el: 1234 of 1234 tests successful (100%).
| byte-compiler-tests.el: 104 of 104 tests successful (100%).
| c-tests.el: 4 of 4 tests successful (100%).
| case-tests.el: 1148 of 1148 tests successful (100%).
| ccl-tests.el: 4570 of 4570 tests successful (100%).
| database-tests.el: 10 of 10 tests successful (100%).
| extent-tests.el: 194 of 194 tests successful (100%).
| hash-table-tests.el: 9866 of 9866 tests successful (100%).
| lisp-tests.el: 3660 of 3660 tests successful (100%).
| md5-tests.el: 56 of 56 tests successful (100%).
| mule-tests.el: 236 of 236 tests successful (100%).
| regexp-tests.el: 208 of 208 tests successful (100%).
| symbol-tests.el: 246 of 246 tests successful (100%).
| syntax-tests.el: 60 of 60 tests successful (100%).
| weak-tests.el: 134 of 134 tests successful (100%).
|
| ============================================
| Total 21730 of 21730 tests successful (100%)
| ============================================
|
| Please report any failures (M-x report-xemacs-bug), and regardless of
| success or failure, do send in a build report (M-x build-report RET).
`----
--
|---<Steve Youngs>---------------<GnuPG KeyID: 10D5C9C5>---|
| XEmacs - The only _______ you'll ever need. |
| Fill in the blank, yes, it's THAT good! |
|------------------------------------<youngs(a)xemacs.org>---|
7545
days inactive
7545
days old
1 comments
2 participants
tags (0)
participants (2)
-
Stephen J. Turnbull -
Steve Youngs