|--==> "VS" == Ville Skytt <Ville> writes: VS> Please tell me what you think, whether I should add the GNU version of VS> diff-mode.el into CVS or not. If yes, maybe there should be lots of VS> other .upstreams there too... No, if we were to do that the package repository would almost double in size overnight.[1] IMO .upstreams should only be needed if there is some reason that makes it difficult or impossible to track otherwise. What happens all too often with the .upstream files is that the package in question gets synched with a newer version with no thought paid to the .upstream file, rendering it useless. Or the .upstream file is taken into account when doing the sync, but that file itself isn't updated, rendering it useless for the next time. VS> (Should this message have been sent to xemacs-beta instead of -patches?) Yes.:-) Footnotes: [1] Exaggerated, I know. -- |---<Steve Youngs>---------------<GnuPG KeyID: 10D5C9C5>---| | XEmacs - It's not just an editor. | | It's a way of life. | |------------------------------------&lt;youngs(a)xemacs.org&gt;---|