Re: Unicode and xemacs
On Thu, 2006-11-16 at 03:25 +0900, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
Ville Skyttä writes:
> And as the maintainer of said packages already for a while, I'd
> appreciate some details about the bugs you're referring to (or if you
> don't have the details, info where you've heard about them),
It was reported here within the last two weeks that in those packages
one gets errors about "not a coding category: iso-8859-15".
Ok, without knowing the context, it smells like a bug in the packages'
site-start.el language environment setup stuff that was reported some
time ago: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/213582
By the way, once it graduates, hopefully the patch Aidan posted recently
about language environment auto-setup will make that stuff unnecessary.
Mike, the part of the site-start.el being discussed is derived from the
SuSE XEmacs packages, so you may be interested in taking a look at the
above report and to check if the SuSE packages are affected too.
I'd never heard of such a bug before. I told the reporter to
report
to Fedora, as it doesn't make any sense to me.
Thanks. No problem with that obviously, but I found the wording and
generalization in your reply to the next user of said OS who dared to
ask something probably entirely unrelated strange and somewhat
offensive.
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://calypso.tux.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta