Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
 Nix writes:
   >  Nothing remotely as good :(
 Far be it from me to actually *code* something to help the
 competition[1], but "somebody" could start ELPA-izing useful XEmacs
 functionality.  If so, I *would* be willing to do the admin work to
 provide an XEmacs ELPA.
 Footnotes:
 [1]  I did that twice, and in both cases was snubbed, ignored, and
 given zero cooperation[2], and generally upset by the experience.
 
(carefully avoiding a flame war) so your experience is the counterpart 
of the  experience (justified or not) made by David Kastrup who, when 
providing xemacs pkg infrastructure for auctex, complained that he did 
not get any help from the xemacs team.
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://lists.xemacs.org/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta