Re: proposed Eistring interface
hmm, this was my existing choice but I changed it out of laziness. if you
thinks it's confusing, i'll change it back.
Didier Verna wrote:
Cosmetics only. All of this looks nice to me, except for one
thing:
the "Eistring (name);" syntax to declare a new variable. The need for
parentheses in this context looks disturbing. I'd prefer another name to the
macro, something like "DECLARE_EISTRING (name);" which looks more like a
function call, but still clearly states that this is a declaration.
--
/ / _ _ Didier Verna http://www.inf.enst.fr/~verna/
- / / - / / /_/ / EPITA / LRDE mailto:didier＠lrde.epita.fr
/_/ / /_/ / /__ / 14-16 rue Voltaire Tel. +33 (1) 44 08 01 77
94276 Kremlin-Bicêtre cedex Fax. +33 (1) 44 08 01 99
--
Ben
In order to save my hands, I am cutting back on my mail. I also write
as succinctly as possible -- please don't be offended. If you send me
mail, you _will_ get a response, but please be patient, especially for
XEmacs-related mail. If you need an immediate response and it is not
apparent in your message, please say so. Thanks for your understanding.
See also http://www.666.com/ben/typing.html.