Re: Problems with new semantic package

> The size of the package also made me stay away from upgrading the Xemacs > version:) Steve suggested I could have a minimal package and then allow > users to download the rest of the bits on demand. Yes, sounds sensible to me too. > I was thinking what would be the best way to do this, to avoid security > issues as well. Is there an Xemacs way to cryptographically sign files, > which is independent on external packages like gpg or pgp? Or should I rely > instead on Java security? Hmm, the mailcrypt package? But it needs pgp/gpg... is that a problem? xslt-process could always require mailcrypt in XEmacs. What files are you planning to sign?