>>>> "BP" == William M Perry
<wmperry(a)gnu.org> writes:
BP> Anybody else noticed that 'make check' fails horribly because of the
BP> package changes lately?
BP> Testing /usr/local/src/xemacs-21.5/tests/automated/byte-compiler-tests.el...
BP> Unexpected error (void-function defadvice) while executing interpreted code.
BP> Test suite execution aborted.
BP> Unexpected error (void-variable message) while executing byte-compiled code.
BP> Test suite execution aborted.
BP> byte-compiler-tests.el: No tests run
BP> Test suite execution failed unexpectedly.
BP> [...]
BP> Testing /usr/local/src/xemacs-21.5/tests/automated/symbol-tests.el...
BP> Unexpected error (void-variable pathname-coding-system) while executing
interpreted code.
BP> Test suite execution aborted.
BP> Unexpected error (void-variable pathname-coding-system) while executing
byte-compiled code.
BP> Test suite execution aborted.
BP> symbol-tests.el: 246 of 248 (99%) tests successful.
BP> Test suite execution failed unexpectedly.
BP> Testing /usr/local/src/xemacs-21.5/tests/automated/syntax-tests.el...
BP> Unexpected error (void-function c-mode) while executing interpreted code.
BP> Test suite execution aborted.
BP> Unexpected error (void-function c-mode) while executing byte-compiled code.
BP> Test suite execution aborted.
BP> syntax-tests.el: 60 of 60 (100%) tests successful.
BP> Test suite execution failed unexpectedly.
BP> Done
BP> Is this just not working yet? I was going to flood stephen
BP> with build reports for linux for the 64 variants my scripts
BP> build, but didn't want to submit bogus 'check' results.
Hi Bill,
I can confirm the breakage in (emacs-version)
"XEmacs 21.5 (beta5) \"beets\" [Lucid] (i586-pc-win32, Mule) of Tue
Apr 02 2002 on D5DC120J"
as well (native Windows).
So I presume your results wouldn't be bogus, since these are for real.
I think Ben is aware of these.
Best regards,
Adrian
BP> -bp
BP> --
BP> Ceterum censeo vi esse delendam
--
Adrian Aichner
mailto:adrianï¼ xemacs.org
http://www.xemacs.org/