Ar an deichiú lá de mí Iúil, scríobh Mats Lidell: 
 >>>>> Stephen wrote:
 
 Stephen> "Someday" we'll move to a Lisp-based mechanism anyway because
 Stephen> Xft can't handle those resources properly AFAIK (at least for
 Stephen> non-Latin-1 characters), and those files will only be useful
 Stephen> for backward compatibility.
 
 Could you please explain? Would adding more languages to
 mule-packages/locale be a waste of time/effort? (Which could explain
 why so few languages are there at the moment!?)
 
 Specifically: I just started with adding support for Swedish. Should I
 stop? 
No, not at all. The Lisp-based mechanism will need accurate translations
too, and the X resources for them will be a good starting point.
-- 
¿Dónde estará ahora mi sobrino Yoghurtu Nghé, que tuvo que huir
precipitadamente de la aldea por culpa de la escasez de rinocerontes?
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://calypso.tux.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta