Adrian.Aichner(a)t-online.de (Adrian Aichner) wrote:
This bug report will be sent to the XEmacs Development Team,
not to your local site managers!!
Please write in English, because the XEmacs maintainers do not have
translators to read other languages for them.
Please describe as succinctly as possible:
- What happened.
- What you thought should have happened.
- Precisely what you were doing at the time.
Please also include any C or lisp back-traces that you may have.
================================================================
Dear Bug Team!
I get this when I try this in an *Ibuffer* (with many matching buffers):
% n ^ * s e n t SPC RET
I cannot reproduce this in vanilla XEmacs yet.
I cannot reproduce it either. Does the error occur in a new instance
of your non-vanilla XEmacs, or is it specific to the state of this
session?
Signaling: (error "Invalid lazy-loaded byte code" @188)
ibuffer-mark-on-buffer((lambda (buf) (string-match regexp (buffer-name buf))))
ibuffer-mark-by-name-regexp("^*sent ")
call-interactively(ibuffer-mark-by-name-regexp)
About a year ago Jan Vroonhof suggested that XEmacs (21.1?) didn't do
lazy-loading:
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&selm=bypusoo0x7.fsf%40bolzano.m...
should stuff in packages rely upon lazy-loading?
--
John Paul Wallington