Re: Why using (push-mark) ?
Holger Schauer <schauer(a)coling.uni-freiburg.de> writes:
>>>>"SJT" == Stephen J Turnbull schrieb am Wed,
14 Oct 1998 13:04:27 +0900 (JST):
>>>>> "Kyle" == Kyle Jones <kyle_jones(a)wonderworks.com>
writes:
>>>>>> Hrvoje writes:
>>> As I said, we're plain lucky that our users never notice this
>>> gorgeous feature.
SJT> Please respect the preferences of others. I don't feel as you
SJT> do.
So, why don't add a variable which would allow switching between the
current and the proposed behaviour and a poll on c.x.e to decide
which behaviour should be the default ?
Because this variable would be worthless unless the new behaviour were
default, and others would never agree with this.
I don't know how my messages come out, but I'd like to stress that I
don't have really strong opinions on this. I can certain live with
the current behaviour.
--
Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic(a)srce.hr> | Student at FER Zagreb, Croatia
--------------------------------+--------------------------------
Manic depression is cool... your body can make its own drugs.