--- Andy Piper <andyp(a)bea.com> wrote:
Rick, there were some more fixes for this in version [2], did you try
that?
I updated from CVS last night, using tag windows-21-4. (emacs-version) now
reports:
XEmacs 21.4 (patch 6) "Common Lisp (Windows [3])" [Lucid] (i686-pc-cygwin) of
Mon Apr 15 2002 on az10-x31074
With Adrian's iconification fix in event-msw.c, C-x C-z works correctly, but
switching windows in my virtual window manager still locks up XEmacs. If I
uncomment the "FRAME_VISIBLE_P (frame) = 1;" statement at line 2656 in
event-msw.c, I can switch windows again, but C-x C-z stops working with the
message "Already iconified?" in the minibuffer.
I *hope* to have some time in the next week or so to look at this in more
detail. At least I now know what Adrian's patch was for... ;-)
--Rick
Thanks
andy
At 09:31 AM 4/15/2002 -0700, Rick Rankin wrote:
>--- Adrian Aichner <adrian(a)xemacs.org> wrote:
> > >>>>> "Rick" == Rick Rankin
<rick_rankin(a)yahoo.com> writes:
> >
> > Rick> --- Adrian Aichner <adrian(a)xemacs.org> wrote:
> > >> >>>>> "Andy" == Andy Piper
<andyp(a)bea.com> writes:
> > >>
> > Andy> I think this is also caused by Adrian's iconify fix.
> > >>
> > Andy> Adrian, what do you think? I'm still inclined to pull your
> > Andy> change :)
> > >>
> > >> Let's clarify the situation and review our options:
> > >>
> > >> Before my patch, iconification was broken for everyone on
Windows.
> > >>
> >
> > Rick> OK, I'm confused. I had noticed absolutely no problems with
> > Rick> iconification prior to the patch, so stating that it was
> >
> > Hi Rick,
> >
> > what exact version of Windows XEmacs, as reported by (emacs-version),
> > were you using that didn't show any problem with iconification?
> >
> > What was broken was iconification via
> > C-x C-z (suspend-or-iconify-emacs)
>
>No, this is not a command I was even familiar with, let alone used. I just
>tried it and it appeared to work the first time, but when I restored the
>window
>and tried it again, I got the message "Already iconified?" in the
minibuffer.
>Is that the symptom you've been trying to fix? If so, how is C-x C-z
different
>internally from just C-z, which appears to work fine? Is there a clue there?
>
>My version is
>
>XEmacs 21.4 (patch 6) "Common Lisp (Windows [1])" [Lucid] (i686-pc-cygwin)
of
>Mon Mar 18 2002 on AZ10-X31074
>
>--Rick
> >
> > Perhaps you didn't use that?
> >
> > Best regards,
> >
> > Adrian
> >
> > Rick> broken for everyone isn't exactly correct. What aspect of
> > Rick> iconification wasn't working?
> >
> > Rick> <remainder of message deleted>
> >
> > Rick> --RIck
> >
> >
> > Rick> __________________________________________________
> > Rick> Do You Yahoo!?
> > Rick> Yahoo! Tax Center - online filing with TurboTax
> > Rick>
http://taxes.yahoo.com/
> >
> >
> > --
> > Adrian Aichner
> > mailto:adrianï¼ xemacs.org
> >
http://www.xemacs.org/
> >
>
>
>__________________________________________________
>Do You Yahoo!?
>Yahoo! Tax Center - online filing with TurboTax
>http://taxes.yahoo.com/
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Tax Center - online filing with TurboTax
http://taxes.yahoo.com/