ht writes:
I checked, and there are a number of other places where system-type
is checked for cygwin32, mostly in conjunction with windows-nt. My
_guess_ is that most if not all of these should be changed to
include cygwin64. Thoughts?
So I wonder if we shouldn't actually replace cygwin32 with cygwin, and
not distinguish 32-bit from 64-bit. Neither windows-nt nor linux nor,
as far as I can see, any of the other systems, distinguish 32-bit from
64-bit.
ht
--
Henry S. Thompson, School of Informatics, University of Edinburgh
10 Crichton Street, Edinburgh EH8 9AB, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht(a)inf.ed.ac.uk
URL:
http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
[mail from me _always_ has a .sig like this -- mail without it is forged spam]
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://lists.xemacs.org/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta