Re: table.el

On Sat, 2002-08-10 at 10:06, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote: Ville> ...into table.el, I suppose? Yes. Ville> edit-utils or text-modes? I think I'd prefer edit-utils. Ville> ISTR table.el needs at least the fsf-compat and pc packages Ville> to work. There's no real reason why a single file can't be a separate package; finer division would help with tuning dependencies. The original reason for packages consisting of multiple more-or-less independent libraries was that Steve Baur didn't have time to split up more finely, and the XEmacs team was responsible for more packages then. It's up to you now, but I thought you'd appreciate the historical background for the current arrangement. If you do put it into one of the existing packages, it would be a good idea to add a one-line blurb saying where table.el is found to man/xemacs/packages.texi. -- Institute of Policy and Planning Sciences http://turnbull.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp University of Tsukuba Tennodai 1-1-1 Tsukuba 305-8573 JAPAN My nostalgia for Icon makes me forget about any of the bad things. I don't have much nostalgia for Perl, so its faults I remember. Scott Gilbert c.l.py