>>>> "nix" == nix
<nix(a)esperi.demon.co.uk> writes:
nix> Alas, if the filename of the glyph being instantiated matches a handler
nix> in the file-name-handler-alist, that handler gets invoked to do the
nix> work, but the operation passed to the handler is 'insert-file-contents,
nix> not 'insert-file-contents-literally --- so when the handler goes off and
nix> reinvokes the operation on the remote site, it uses the wrong function
nix> call, and takes coding-systems into account even though glyph-loading
I don't think `insert-file-contents' is the wrong function, because
there's nothing inherent about it that takes coding systems into
account (`insert-file-contents-literally' *calls*
`insert-file-contents' eventually). Rather, it dynamically binds the
various implicit parameters determining the coding system. (Or do
they?) I think you're saying these get rebound during the process,
but I'm not sure. If so, we need to figure out where. Dired sure
isn't doing it.
--
Cheers =8-} Mike
Friede, Völkerverständigung und überhaupt blabla