Re: Coexisting XEmacsen
On 13 Mar 2002 at 11:36:40 +0900, "Stephen J. Turnbull"
<stephen(a)xemacs.org> wrote:
The patch looks straightforward to me. In the long run we probably
ought to implement the program-name-prefix stuff, instead, though.
Pardon my ignorance. What is the program-name-prefix stuff? Should I
bother submitting this patch to xemacs-patches, or would you rather hold
off for program-name-prefix?
One thing that bothered me is the deletion of
AC_SUBST(doc_dir)
is that intentional? Why?
Oh, yes, that should have been in a separate patch. There are two
instances of AC_SUBST(docdir) in the current configure.in (at least for
21.4, anyway), on lines 4692 and 4714. The first one is sufficient.
--
Jerry James