Re: Macros: Scheme vs Common Lisp
Craig Lanning <CraigL(a)internetx.net> writes:
On the idea of replacement Lisp Engines, has anyone considered using
a Lisp to C compiler so that a large part of the core functionality
can be written in Lisp and then translated to C.
Take a look at CLiCC (http://www.informatik.uni-kiel.de/~wg/clicc.html).
It reads a subset of CLtL1 (called CL_0) and CLOS (called CLOS_0) and
translates it into a stylized version of C (heavy use of C macros).
ECoLisp also compiles Comon Lisp to C and provides good Common Lisp-C
integration.
http://www.di.unipi.it/~attardi/software.html
Yours,
--
Clemens Heitzinger
Student der Techn. Mathematik, Technische Universität Wien, Österreich
Vienna University of Technology, Austria