Re: Is anyone using gud?
Oscar Figueiredo <Oscar.Figueiredo(a)di.epfl.ch> writes:
>>>>> "sb" == SL Baur
<steve(a)xemacs.org> writes:
sb> There's gdb.el/gdbsrc.el for GDB and the EOS stuff for DBX. Is anyone
sb> using gud? Is the XEmacs version usable?
One colleague of mine tried to use it a couple of weeks ago and he
commented about the lack of completion on function names (when you
set a breakpoint for instance) which exists in FSF Emacs.
Yeah, but the same goes for our gdb mode, doesn't it?
Are you sure he was actually using gud, as opposed to the plain gdb
mode?
--
Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic(a)srce.hr> | Student at FER Zagreb, Croatia
--------------------------------+--------------------------------
The Lord protects children and fools... But don't push it.