Re: Converting from using CVS to hg
Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
> If I am only compiling and using XEmacs--not contributing code, is
> hg still the way I should go?
Yes. Because hg is so much better at branching, what you probably
want to do is to keep a pristine checkout of XEmacs, and a separate
checkout of your changes. so the initial clone would look like
[quick howto on hg usage deleted]
Something like this should go, IMHO, on the Web site, e.g., in
Develop/hpaccess.html, just like Develop/cvsaccess.html.
It would be a great help to those of us who track the 21.5
development. Exactly such a recipe gives me the headup to try it
out and switch from CVS.
Joachim
--
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Joachim Schrod Email: jschrod(a)acm.org
Roedermark, Germany
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://calypso.tux.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta