Hrvoje Niksic wrote:
Didier Verna <didier(a)xemacs.org> writes:
> True, but that doesn't make it a good argument *not* to change the
> order.
Of course. I just wanted to prevent changing something that works for
frivolous reasons. However:
> There are more important problems, like starting packages from the
> init files, resulting in customizations not being set up when the
> package is run.
I agree that it is a good reason. Maybe we should, for additional
safety, ask Per Abrahamsen what he thinks about the ordering change?
Yup. I still can see an argument one could raise against changing the
order:
- with the current order, you can 1/ change the custom file name and 2/ load
it before (the rest of) the init file (in order words, swap the order).
- with the opposite order, you can do neither of these.
Actually, you probably could, if we provided command line options for doing
that.
--
Didier Verna, didier(a)lrde.epita.fr,
http://www.lrde.epita.fr/~didier
EPITA / LRDE, 14-16 rue Voltaire Tel.+33 (1) 53 14 59 47
94276 Le Kremlin-BicĂȘtre, France Fax.+33 (1) 44 08 01 99 didier(a)xemacs.org