I always use a non-MULE XEmacs to build all the non-MULE packages. I
think this is an important checkstep. I also am currently building
the packages against 21.1.
- Vin
Ville Skyttä <ville.skytta(a)xemacs.org> writes:
Because if I or Pete or someone at some point of time are confused
enough to try building packages for distribution with a non-Mule XEmacs,
this could maybe save a couple of bug reports roundtrips...
Assuming, of course, that one has to use a Mule XEmacs when releasing
packages. I don't know if this is already handled some other way in the
build/release scripts, as I'm not too familiar with them ATM. Please
correct if this assumption is BS.