Re: Package Maintainers Heads Up
skip(a)pobox.com writes:
On November 7 I wrote:
Ville> 1) The new vc hasn't been around for too long yet, so I'm pretty
Ville> sure we'll find more things as it gets more exposure.
me> I still can't cleanly "just use it". I go through this series
of
me> steps after XEmacs starts:
me> * Try ediff-revision (the most common thing I do)
me> * Get an error about this 'state' variable being undefined
me> * (setq debug-on-error t)
me> * Try again
me> * find-function whatever-it-is
me> * C-x C-e
me> Then I'm off to the races. I've cvs up'd and reinstalled the
me> packages a couple times but I still get this error.
I saw no responses to my message. Is this problem not considered a bug
*somewhere* in XEmacs or one of its packages?
It's a bug.
As to why it didn't get a response, I suppose that's because it looks
like it's "Ville's thread", and most developers probably assume
he'll
take care of it. But he's announced that he's busy, so it may take a
bit.
Ville, are you going to take a shot at this, or do you want somebody
else to look at it?
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://calypso.tux.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta