Re: Problems with new semantic package
|--==> "VS" == Ville Skytt <Ville> writes:
VS> On Mon, 2002-08-12 at 09:30, Ovidiu Predescu wrote:
>I was thinking what would be the best way to do this, to avoid
security
>issues as well. Is there an Xemacs way to cryptographically sign files,
>which is independent on external packages like gpg or pgp? Or should I
>rely instead on Java security?
VS> Hmm, the mailcrypt package? But it needs pgp/gpg... is that a
VS> problem? xslt-process could always require mailcrypt in XEmacs.
Hi Ovidiu!
We've just added a new package to XEmacs called "ecrypto", this sounds
like something it could handle. It hasn't been released in the
mainline packages yet, but it is in Pre-Release.
Check it out...
/ftp.xemacs.org:/pub/xemacs/beta/experimental/packages/
HTH
--
|---<Steve Youngs>---------------<GnuPG KeyID: 10D5C9C5>---|
| XEmacs - It's not just an editor. |
| It's a way of life. |
|------------------------------------<youngs(a)xemacs.org>---|