Re: Problems with new semantic package
On Wed, 2002-08-07 at 00:10, A.J. Rossini wrote:
>> Or is there a real requirement that they should be
updated now, instead
>> of updating all of them when there's a new *stable* upstream version of
>> them available?
andy> It depends how you define stable. The combined new packages work
andy> better for me than the current "stable" versions.
I would strongly agree with Andy, here. Also, they seem to be
required for ECB, which is extremely useful.
Yep, I'd like to try out ECB too (I have an initial version of a package
in unsupported/scop waiting for semantic to be updated).
But first we need to make sure that the _existing_ XEmacs packages work
after the upgrade...
--
\/ille Skyttä
ville.skytta at xemacs.org