Re: [AUCTeX-devel] Re: [comp.emacs.xemacs] AUCTeX 11.84 released
Uwe Brauer <oub(a)mat.ucm.es> writes:
I disagree here. There is a difference to add
(require 'tex-site) or
the like to a .emacs file
than to try to install even a complied Xemacs package which you
offer. I presume we simply are thinking of different users here.
Especially users of the MS Windows environment are not used to
unpack packages in some directories they don't know. Believe me
there are a lot of users still using (La)TeX but they are not
hackers at all.
Unless I am mistaken, the main point of the package system was to make
it possible for non-hackers to manage the installation of XEmacs
packages.
If you say that this fails to be the case, it should be fixed.
Anyhow I don't want to start a flamewar on this but to start to
synchronise. Let us hope the best (any help would be appreciate as
always.)
When you find yourself stuck, ask on emacs-devel.
--
David Kastrup
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://calypso.tux.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta