[Meta question: Is timp(a)redhat.com the person to contact about the
Redhat XEmacs packages. It would be nice to have a liason with each
distributor. I occasionally contact the Debian maintainer when have a
critical linux bugfix.]
the JRPM60 xemacs packages to get their feed back too. I guess one
solution would be to allow separate DOC files for each xemacs
executable: this would require some (I think) minor changes to the
xemacs sources and "src/Makefile", something like an option to add a
given suffix to the xemacs executable name and the corresponding "DOC"
and "config.values" files.
I think we already support this (on request of the Debian maintainer,
to fix the same problem), you can use the --docdir argument to
configure to make XEmacs put its docfile where you want.
Jan