>>>> "John" == John A Turner
<turner(a)blueskystudios.com> writes:
>>>> "PA" == Per Abrahamsen
<abraham(a)dina.kvl.dk>:
> "John A. Turner" <turner(a)blueskystudios.com> writes:
>> I'm curious - how many developers out there have a near-minimal base .emacs
>> with all customization possible done via customize?
PA> You can't, customize only handles a subset of the things you would
PA> want to customize. Symbol properties and specifiers aren't handled
PA> (except though kludges) nor are something as basic ot an editor as key
PA> bindings. And of course, a developer will want to add new
PA> functionality, which is outside the scope of what customize _should_
PA> do.
John> understood - that's what I meant by "near-minimal" and
"all customization
John> possible" - admittedly not the best wording, esp. the latter
John> guess I meant "all customizable customization" or "all
customize-enabled
John> customization" or "all customization with a controlling legal
authority"
I have a fairly minimal base .emacs. When I decided to switch to
customize many months ago, I tried to convert everything at that time
to customize. If more things have customize interfaces now, then I
haven't made that change yet.
I also haven't migrated all of my hooks to customize yet.
Ray