sb> sb> Greg Klanderman <greg(a)alphatech.com&gt; writes in xemacs-beta(a)xemacs.org: sb> sb> Granted that making a separate elib package because pcl-cvs needs it sb> is not a sufficient reason to make it separate. But what about SKK sb> which also needs it? It makes more sense to have SKK require elib sb> than it does to require pcl-cvs, what does CVS have to do with sb> entering Japanese? :-) Of course this makes sense. Somehow I thought Karl intended to add all of elib to the pcl-cvs package, which upon re-reading his email is obviously not the case. sb> sb> Then it will be O.K. with you if we use Karl's package and remove the sb> copies of elib from pcl-cvs? certainly Karl> Karl> I've taken the Debian GNU/Linux packaged version of `elib', and Karl> imported it into my personal cvs repository of the XEmacs package Karl> sources. I did this because the newest `pcl-cvs' requires it.