Re: Package Maintainers Heads Up

On Thursday 08 November 2007, Norbert Koch wrote: Not mandatory, but two things: 1) The new vc hasn't been around for too long yet, so I'm pretty sure we'll find more things as it gets more exposure. It would have been nice to have someone look at vc-hg.el from GNU before release, perhaps to be used as a mercurial.el replacement, but nobody has said anything definite about looking into it so I guess it doesn't make sense to wait for it. 2) The latest cperl-mode.el upstream sync has reportedly caused some fontification regressions. I've promised to look into it but have not found the time, and don't know when I will. I think it would not hurt to keep the new perl-modes package in the experimental area for some time still; OTOH the new cperl-mode does have some nice benefits and has worked acceptably well for me, so I'm not insisting that it shouldn't be promoted. _______________________________________________ XEmacs-Beta mailing list XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org http://calypso.tux.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta