Re: Extent boundaries inconsistent w.r.t. extent properties
On Mon, 15 Apr 2002, Darryl Okahata spake:
Michael Toomim <toomim(a)cs.berkeley.edu> wrote:
> This won't work for me. My extents all need to be start-open & end-closed
in
> order to make sure that every keystroke gets inserted into exactly one extent
> (my extents run end-to-end across the buffer).
The end-to-endness is your problem :(
I don't understand how this would not work for you. As
your
extents are start-open, begin-glyphs would always be visible, regardless
of the extent visibility.
No; XEmacs assumes that if an invisible extent is at the same position
as a glyph, that the glyph shouldn't be displayed, even if the invisible
extent isn't the same one as the one that has the glyph attached :(
--
`Unless they've moved it since I last checked, travelling between
England and America does not involve crossing the equator.'
--- pir