Re: top-level packages repo
Mike Kupfer writes:
Henry S. Thompson wrote:
> As far as I can make sense of things, that's because the top-level
> repo tip is at 17 May, but gnus itself is at 27 June, when the
> relevant patch came in.
Yes, that's what I see, too.
Norbert, can you fix the top-level packages repo, please?
Is this related to the following, which I see when I pull and then
update at the top of the xemacs-packages tree:
subrepository sources for xemacs-packages/gnus differ (in checked out version)
use (l)ocal source (45540f5758d2) or (r)emote source (de9ea3b04d44)?
What should I answer?
ht
--
Henry S. Thompson, School of Informatics, University of Edinburgh
10 Crichton Street, Edinburgh EH8 9AB, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht(a)inf.ed.ac.uk
URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
[mail from me _always_ has a .sig like this -- mail without it is forged spam]
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://lists.xemacs.org/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta