Re: [Success/exposed test failures] XEmacs 21.4.14 "Reasonable Discussion" i586-pc-win32

Hrvoje> What does C89 say about this? I suspect MS (and Unix98) Hrvoje> might have followed an older, more permissive standard. Heh. Several hundred USD plus postage will get you the answer to that. All Google could find was a couple dozen posts saying "no, C89 now only exists on paper." Hrvoje> Yes, if by follow you mean "use or implement where Hrvoje> unavailable". That's what I meant by "follow". This still leaves the question of "who does the implementation" up for debate. It's probably not going to be me. -- Institute of Policy and Planning Sciences http://turnbull.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp University of Tsukuba Tennodai 1-1-1 Tsukuba 305-8573 JAPAN Ask not how you can "do" free software business; ask what your business can "do for" free software.