On Mon, 15 Apr 2002 22:45:34 BST, Nix said:
No; XEmacs assumes that if an invisible extent is at the same
position
as a glyph, that the glyph shouldn't be displayed, even if the invisible
extent isn't the same one as the one that has the glyph attached :(
This sounds suspiciously like the proof that there is an invisible cat
in the room - you can't see him, therefore he must be there. ;)