Re: Is anyone using gud?
>>>> "sb" == SL Baur <steve(a)xemacs.org>
writes:
sb> There's gdb.el/gdbsrc.el for GDB and the EOS stuff for DBX. Is anyone
sb> using gud? Is the XEmacs version usable?
One colleague of mine tried to use it a couple of weeks ago and he commented
about the lack of completion on function names (when you set a breakpoint for
instance) which exists in FSF Emacs. For the rest it seemed usable. I didn't
have time to have a look at it myself.
Oscar