Karl Kleinpaste writes:
> Those Who Know are wrong,
I agreed at the time and still do. OK ...
Would a run-time command-line option be satisfactory? With a
configure option to determine whether getaddrinfo is IPv6-ly correct
or not by default? N.B. I'm not willing to go in the direction of Do
The Right Thing for the 21.4 series because that would involve second-
guessing the user and the standard AFAICT. And I think it has to be a
command-line option because this lookup gets done before X resources
or .emacs gets parsed.
I don't know when this will get implemented, though. I personally do
not have time for the near future (2-4 weeks), given a simple
workaround (set DISPLAY=127.0.0.1:0.0).
I would be interested in a specification of Do The Right Thing for
21.5 (probably to be released in September). I don't know who would
implement it (I'm probably not competent, see below), so I can't
promise it would be in by then. But I'd try; I've been bitten by this
one too.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Further info and philosophical BS you may or may not want to know about:
I don't know about this stuff, so I accepted the judgement of the
people who approved or implemented the patches in the first place (I
was not even on XEmacs Review at the time) when I wrote the PROBLEMS
entry.
>>>> "Michael" == Michael McNamara
<mac(a)verisity.com> writes:
Michael> First citing 'Those Who Know' without references gets my
Michael> hackles up.
Sorry about that. I'll try to avoid obscure sarcasm in the future.
(I'm new at being a "public face of XEmacs.")
Anyway, that's exactly what I got when I bitched about it at the time.
Try Martin Buchholz <martin(a)xemacs.org> as the person most likely to
have approved the patch. Citing, IIRC, core members of the IPv6 group
at the WIDE project.
See the thread rooted at
http://www.xemacs.org/list-archives/xemacs-beta/200007/msg00348.html
specifically
http://www.xemacs.org/list-archives/xemacs-beta/200007/msg00374.html
Searching "IPv6" at
http://www.xemacs.org/list-archives/xemacs-beta/
will get you a couple more threads. Now you have all the references I
do. I don't recall any RFCs being mentioned, but maybe I've just
forgotten.
Michael> In these days of instant access, it would be simple for
Michael> you to look up
I am not an expert on network stuff, nor the standards, and was not
involved in the implementation of IPv6 in XEmacs. It would be simple,
yes, but time-consuming for me personally---I don't know exactly where
to look, and would have to confirm that the reference I gave actually
said what I have cited others as saying.
--
University of Tsukuba Tennodai 1-1-1 Tsukuba 305-8573 JAPAN
Institute of Policy and Planning Sciences Tel/fax: +81 (298) 53-5091
_________________ _________________ _________________ _________________
What are those straight lines for? "XEmacs rules."