Re: i upgraded ps-print
On Wed, 2002-08-07 at 17:01, Steve Youngs wrote:
VS> Someone who knows the Makefile spaghetti better (than me),
please take a
VS> look if this could be cleanly fixed in XEmacs.rules :]
I'll take a look, remind me if you don't see anything happen by 2034 OK?
You can count on that :)
VS> Additionally, the ps-print Makefile could yell if building
with
VS> non-Mule; a warning about a couple of files that won't be included in
VS> the build would be appropriate.
I'm flying through my mail trying to catch up at the moment, so I may
have missed something. Why do you want this?
Because if I or Pete or someone at some point of time are confused
enough to try building packages for distribution with a non-Mule XEmacs,
this could maybe save a couple of bug reports roundtrips...
Assuming, of course, that one has to use a Mule XEmacs when releasing
packages. I don't know if this is already handled some other way in the
build/release scripts, as I'm not too familiar with them ATM. Please
correct if this assumption is BS.
--
\/ille Skyttä
ville.skytta at xemacs.org