Somewhere along the line we renamed the 21.2 tarballs from
xemacs-21.2-b3.tar.gz
to
xemacs-21.2.16.tar.gz
Is the current naming convention documented?
Is it a bug that xemacs is still *installed* into directories with
names like xemacs-21.2-b23 ??
ObPatch (completely untested):
--- configure.in 1999/12/08 07:43:35 1.111.2.53
+++ configure.in 1999/12/09 12:17:43
@@ -954,12 +954,11 @@
AC_DEFINE_UNQUOTED(EMACS_MAJOR_VERSION, $emacs_major_version)
AC_DEFINE_UNQUOTED(EMACS_MINOR_VERSION, $emacs_minor_version)
if test -n "$emacs_beta_version" ; then
+ version="${version}.${emacs_beta_version}"
if test "$beta" = "yes"; then
- version="${version}-b${emacs_beta_version}"
- AC_DEFINE_UNQUOTED(EMACS_BETA_VERSION, $emacs_beta_version)
+ AC_DEFINE_UNQUOTED(EMACS_BETA_VERSION, $emacs_beta_version)
else
- version="${version}.${emacs_beta_version}"
- AC_DEFINE_UNQUOTED(EMACS_PATCH_LEVEL, $emacs_beta_version)
+ AC_DEFINE_UNQUOTED(EMACS_PATCH_LEVEL, $emacs_beta_version)
fi
fi
AC_DEFINE_UNQUOTED(XEMACS_CODENAME, "$xemacs_codename")