Re: What to do with modules now ...
At 06:48 11/01/99 +0100, Hrvoje Niksic wrote:
Why? In this case, "subtly affecting existing code"
doesn't apply to
source code; most of the differences are hidden with the clever use of
preprocessor macros. While to a careless observer it may seem that
Mule code looks "the same" in both Mule and non-Mule cases, the fact
is that compiled code differs wildly.
If this is the case (and I know that it is) doesn't this make dynamic
loading less useful since you will have to have modules compiled for every
sort of build (mule, non-mule etc)
andy
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
" .sigs are like your face - rarely seen by you and uglier than you think"
Dr Andy Piper, Technical Architect, Parallax Solutions Ltd
mail: andyp(a)parallax.co.uk web: www.parallax.co.uk/~andyp