Re: table.el

> As for packaging this library, sounds like a great idea. Go right ahead. :-) > > Seriously, Ville, Rendhalver, Steve Y, and I would be happy to help, > but if you do it (asking questions as you go along) it will probably > happen a lot sooner than if you wait on us to do it. Actually, I've also tried out table.el before, and adding it to a package is on my TODO list (I've had it around in my package tree for some months). It just got bumped upwards in the list... edit-utils or text-modes? I think I'd prefer edit-utils. ISTR table.el needs at least the fsf-compat and pc packages to work.