Re: Problems with new semantic package
On Mon, 2002-08-12 at 09:30, Ovidiu Predescu wrote:
Hi Ville,
Sorry for replying so late, your message got lost in a ton of others.
No problem!
> Ovidiu, we're talking about possibly upgrading jde, eieio,
speedbar and
> semantic to their latest versions in XEmacs. Do you know if
> xslt-process will work with them?
I think with 2.1 I already use the latest eieio, speedbar and semantic, but
I'll make sure it does work.
Cool.
> Oh, and we still have xslt-process 1.2.1. Wouldn't it make
sense to
> upgrade it to a newer version, I see 2.1 is the current one. Of course,
> 2.1 would have to be stripped down quite a bit, 6MB+ gzipped is IMHO a
> bit much for a single XEmacs package... :)
The size of the package also made me stay away from upgrading the Xemacs
version:) Steve suggested I could have a minimal package and then allow
users to download the rest of the bits on demand.
Yes, sounds sensible to me too.
I was thinking what would be the best way to do this, to avoid
security
issues as well. Is there an Xemacs way to cryptographically sign files,
which is independent on external packages like gpg or pgp? Or should I rely
instead on Java security?
Hmm, the mailcrypt package? But it needs pgp/gpg... is that a problem?
xslt-process could always require mailcrypt in XEmacs. What files are
you planning to sign?
--
\/ille Skyttä
ville.skytta at xemacs.org