Jan Vroonhof wrote:
 > I suggested the following patch:
 
 Did you post it to xemacs-patches(a)xemacs.org to get it into the formal 
 review process? 
Er, no. What I said originally was:
 I'm posting this here because it probably warrants more
discussion
 than it's going to get if I post it to xemacs-patches. 
I'll post it to xemacs-patches, which is probably what I should have
done in the first place.
-- 
Glynn Clements <glynn(a)sensei.co.uk>