Re: Fortran.el

From: Tom Browder <tom.browder(a)gmail.com&gt; Subject: Re: Fortran.el To: giacomo.boffi(a)polimi.it Cc: xemacs-beta(a)xemacs.org Date: Monday, January 19, 2009, 11:53 PM On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 6:30 AM, Tom Browder <tom.browder(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: ... > I just looked at compile.el in xemacs-packages/lisp/base (xemacs 21.4) > and I don't think it is set up to handle the warning and error format > of gfortran as near as I can tell. I will look at the emacs version > and see if I can see a difference since emacs has been reported to > work with gformat. Well, the two files differ considerably--looks like they have diverged since about 1995. The regexes for gnu compilers are significantly more complex in the emacs case--maybe handling for gfortran is buried in there somewhere.

And I confirmed that emacs handles gfortran output fine.

Is anyone maintaining compile.el for xemacs now? I also found mode-compile.el and tried to get it to autoload but haven't had any success. I also tried xemacs 21.5.b28 and couldn't get compile to work at all. Suggestions welcome. Thanks. -Tom _______________________________________________ XEmacs-Beta mailing list XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org http://calypso.tux.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta