On Mon, 22 Apr 2002, Alastair Houghton wrote:
 > On Sunday 14 April 2002 14:53, William M. Perry wrote:
 >
 > 	Thanks....if he got something then i hope we can work 
 > together.....as soon as
 > i got time i want to experiment also, i think making a port of xemacs 
 > in qt
 > is a good idea, xemacs would take full advantage of all the qt-features,
 > speaking of which i got a little question, xemacs beta cant see the 
 > truetype
 > fonts in my machine, why is that ?? im using XFree-4.1 with the XRender 
 > and
 > freetype support.....is it because there's no explicit linkage of 
 > xemacs with
 > freetype ??
 >
 You'll have to be a little bit careful with this one; according to the 
 information about GTK XEmacs, QPL'd software can't be linked with GPL'd 
 software without the consent of *all* of the copyright holders (at 
 least, that's RMS' stance). Personally I think a QT port would be a good 
 thing, but I think it is very unlikely (since QT isn't proper Free 
 Software) that the FSF (one of the major copyright holders) would agree 
 to a QT port. 
Sorry, I don't believe this is correct, QT is licensed under GPL and is
free software.  It is not GNU software though.  RMS doesn't seem to think 
that a QT port of, e.g., emacs would worthwile though.