Re: Milestone 1 submission...
wmperry(a)aventail.com (William M. Perry) writes:
Andy Piper <andy(a)xemacs.ORG> writes:
> At 07:22 PM 4/15/00 -0700, Ben Wing wrote:
> >hasn't andy already created a bunch of abstract interfaces onto widgets?
>
> Well, extended the glyph syntax is probably more accurate. But the syntax
> is abstract and does work, even if it is very simple.
I really don't like the thought of writing a complex gui as a bunch of
glyph instantiators either. For things that will be going in the gutter
this is doable, but writing something like the `customize' interface from
sawmill would be ... not fun.
You can write a high-level API on top of a low-level API. This is
what widget.el does, can't you use the widget.el framework to provide
a more convenient interface to a glyph based implementation?