Re: Qt Xemacs ??
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Saturday 27 April 2002 02:40, Simon Josefsson wrote:
"Stephen J. Turnbull" <stephen(a)xemacs.org> writes:
> >> You'll have to be a little bit careful with this one; according
> >> to the information about GTK XEmacs, QPL'd software can't be
> >> linked with GPL'd software without the consent of *all* of the
> >> copyright holders (at least, that's RMS' stance).
>
> Simon> Sorry, I don't believe this is correct, QT is licensed
> Simon> under GPL and is free software. It is not GNU software
> Simon> though. RMS doesn't seem to think that a QT port of, e.g.,
> Simon> emacs would worthwile though.
>
> Windows, Windows, Windows, Windows. AFAIK Qt is still QPL on Windows.
Oops, I didn't know that. That's bad, really.
Still i would be interested in a Qt-port, Qt is GPL'ed under linux and other
unix systems, quite frankly i wasnt thinking about windows in all of this, i
think there are free versions of QT for windows if you make free software,
but still the disadvantage is that those Qt versions arent the last one,
thats bad :(.....but i still say: why not a unix-Qt port of xemacs ??
Cheers...
- --
rcm.
rcm(a)gmx.co.uk
GPG Public Key: http://ada.fciencias.unam.mx/~rconde/rodolfo_gpg.txt
ICQ 118193727
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iD8DBQE8y0hbx2Sktruwba0RAvkGAJ9IMpQiogxbZWYlOnjlUkVxrCB9XACgrncN
84lES3WhfveMF8iB90qeoA8=
=Swu9
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----