Re: Common Lisp vs. Scheme
Glynn Clements writes:
Raymond Toy wrote:
> One question, though, on the tail-recursive feature. It's nice to
> have but is it really, really important? Elisp isn't (right?), and
> we've been doing fine without proper tail recursion.
We've been *surviving* without tail recursion optimisation.
BTW, I see no reason why this can't be added to the current
byte-compiler. It seems an easy optimization after the lexical
scope pragma is put in.