Re: Moving to GPLv3 - the practical side of it
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
on 03/23/2009 12:29 AM Stephen J. Turnbull said the following:
A partly GPLv3
code base is undistributable. Technically since we're not
incorporated we can't even share it with each other
Two things I don't understand about this:
1. Why aren't we (technically) allowed to share (distribute) source
code files? I can understand not being allowed to distribute
executable code whose source is partially GPLv3, but I don't
understand this restriction for source files.
2. What does being incorporated have to do with it? Surely most GPL'ed
projects are *not* incorporated.
- --- Vladimir
- --
Vladimir G. Ivanovic
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iEYEARECAAYFAknH7iEACgkQtoykdjDhdFsAJgCfVOL2t7chQuB8rT8vFCvjs/1e
++EAnRo1bqWXXsVEz2U/1MLxMWUerA3h
=y5UD
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://calypso.tux.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta