10:39 p.m.
"Stephen J. Turnbull" <stephen(a)xemacs.org> さんは書きました:
Currently 21.5 is operationally stable. It has few crashes, none
reproducible AFAIK, and no other outstanding showstoppers.
What annoys me most are the frequent crashes on x86_64 platforms. At
least once a day for me. Unfortunately, I cannot find a procedure to
reproduce these crashes.
The second most annoying thing is that often the memory
consumption goes up without any apparent reason. Right
now the xemacs I am using to type this mail uses more than
a gigabyte memory:
top - 23:38:54 up 5 days, 5:21, 24 users, load average: 0.02, 0.23, 0.44
Tasks: 211 total, 2 running, 209 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie
Cpu(s): 5.3%us, 3.0%sy, 0.0%ni, 90.4%id, 1.3%wa, 0.0%hi, 0.0%si, 0.0%st
Mem: 2061292k total, 2000676k used, 60616k free, 30564k buffers
Swap: 2947876k total, 563904k used, 2383972k free, 292524k cached
PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND
23943 mfabian 20 0 1232m 1.0g 12m S 0.3 52.3 161:59.62 xemacs
Slowly increasing. And I have no idea why.
--
Mike FABIAN <mfabian(a)suse.de> http://www.suse.de/~mfabian
睡眠不足はいい仕事の敵だ。
I � Unicode
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://calypso.tux.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta
10:56 p.m.
New subject: XEmacs 21.5 beta and FC 9 preview
On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 3:39 PM, Mike FABIAN <mfabian(a)suse.de> wrote:
What annoys me most are the frequent crashes on x86_64 platforms.
At
least once a day for me. Unfortunately, I cannot find a procedure to
reproduce these crashes.
Hmmm.... I'm using XEmacs on an x86_64 platform every day at work, and I've
had no crashes for a long time. Can you show us your compilation options?
Have you applied any patches to the source tree? Do you have a stacktrace
we can diagnose?
--
Jerry James
http://loganjerry.googlepages.com/
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://calypso.tux.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta
12:02 a.m.
New subject: XEmacs 21.5 beta and FC 9 preview
Mike FABIAN writes:
"Stephen J. Turnbull" <stephen(a)xemacs.org> さんは書きました:
> Currently 21.5 is operationally stable. It has few crashes, none
> reproducible AFAIK, and no other outstanding showstoppers.
What annoys me most are the frequent crashes on x86_64 platforms. At
least once a day for me. Unfortunately, I cannot find a procedure to
reproduce these crashes.
Have you posted a bug to the tracker (searching on creator=mfabian +
module='core code 21.5' gives nothing, searching on module="code code
21.5" + "all text"="crash" gives 68, 149, 317, and 220, none of
which
look familiar)? Please make sure that there's a backtrace with the
bug. A cross-ref to the Novell/SuSE tracker would be acceptable (just
write out an URL in the Comment field).
The second most annoying thing is that often the memory
consumption goes up without any apparent reason. Right
now the xemacs I am using to type this mail uses more than
a gigabyte memory:
Known issue, cause unknown, except it's presumably in GC. When you
discuss memory issues, please CC Marcus Crestani
<crestani(a)xemacs.org>, GC is his baby, but he only seems to
intermittently pay attention to the list. You could also create a bug
for it and assign it to him. Then he will get pinged any time someone
adds to it.
Some people have run under malloc debuggers, but that's really painful
:-(. Detecting a slow leak that way is probably not really feasible.
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://calypso.tux.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta
1:56 p.m.
New subject: XEmacs 21.5 beta and FC 9 preview
"Stephen J. Turnbull" <stephen(a)xemacs.org> さんは書きました:
Mike FABIAN writes:
> "Stephen J. Turnbull" <stephen(a)xemacs.org> さんは書きました:
>
> > Currently 21.5 is operationally stable. It has few crashes, none
> > reproducible AFAIK, and no other outstanding showstoppers.
>
> What annoys me most are the frequent crashes on x86_64 platforms. At
> least once a day for me. Unfortunately, I cannot find a procedure to
> reproduce these crashes.
Have you posted a bug to the tracker (searching on creator=mfabian +
module='core code 21.5' gives nothing, searching on module="code code
21.5" + "all text"="crash" gives 68, 149, 317, and 220, none of
which
look familiar)? Please make sure that there's a backtrace with the
bug. A cross-ref to the Novell/SuSE tracker would be acceptable (just
write out an URL in the Comment field).
I had a crash again today with about the same backtrace as the
one I reported in
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.xemacs.beta/25307
I’ll enter this in the xemacs bug tracker anon.
--
Mike FABIAN <mfabian(a)suse.de> http://www.suse.de/~mfabian
睡眠不足はいい仕事の敵だ。
I � Unicode
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://calypso.tux.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta
3:32 p.m.
New subject: XEmacs 21.5 beta and FC 9 preview
Mike FABIAN <mfabian(a)suse.de> さんは書きました:
"Stephen J. Turnbull" <stephen(a)xemacs.org> さんは書きました:
> Mike FABIAN writes:
> > "Stephen J. Turnbull" <stephen(a)xemacs.org> さんは書きました:
> >
> > > Currently 21.5 is operationally stable. It has few crashes, none
> > > reproducible AFAIK, and no other outstanding showstoppers.
> >
> > What annoys me most are the frequent crashes on x86_64 platforms. At
> > least once a day for me. Unfortunately, I cannot find a procedure to
> > reproduce these crashes.
>
> Have you posted a bug to the tracker (searching on creator=mfabian +
> module='core code 21.5' gives nothing, searching on module="code code
> 21.5" + "all text"="crash" gives 68, 149, 317, and 220, none
of which
> look familiar)? Please make sure that there's a backtrace with the
> bug. A cross-ref to the Novell/SuSE tracker would be acceptable (just
> write out an URL in the Comment field).
I had a crash again today with about the same backtrace as the
one I reported in
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.xemacs.beta/253071
I’ll enter this in the xemacs bug tracker anon.
Took a bit longer than I thought because I ran into a konqueror4
problem¹ while trying to enter this but it is here now:
http://tracker.xemacs.org/XEmacs/its/issue359
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=383341
Footnote:
¹ http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=383359
--
Mike FABIAN <mfabian(a)suse.de> http://www.suse.de/~mfabian
睡眠不足はいい仕事の敵だ。
I � Unicode
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://calypso.tux.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta
2:56 p.m.
New subject: XEmacs 21.5 beta and FC 9 preview
Mike FABIAN <mfabian(a)suse.de> さんは書きました:
Why can’t I see this issue on the start page of the tracker
(http://tracker.xemacs.org/XEmacs/its/)?
I can see it if I search for issue #359. But on the start page
of the tracker the list currently starts with issue 360
and the next one is 358.
--
Mike FABIAN <mfabian(a)suse.de> http://www.suse.de/~mfabian
睡眠不足はいい仕事の敵だ。
I � Unicode
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://calypso.tux.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta
5:21 a.m.
New subject: XEmacs 21.5 beta and FC 9 preview
>>>> "mfabian" == Mike FABIAN
<mfabian(a)suse.de> writes:
mfabian> Why can’t I see this issue on the start page of the tracker
mfabian> (http://tracker.xemacs.org/XEmacs/its/)?
The default sorting first displays issues that don't have a priority
set. Since #359 has priority set to "normal", it shows up a couple
pages later with all the other normal priority issues.
mike
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://calypso.tux.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta
1:44 p.m.
New subject: XEmacs 21.5 beta and FC 9 preview
Mike FABIAN <mfabian(a)suse.de> さんは書きました:
>> > What annoys me most are the frequent crashes on x86_64
platforms. At
>> > least once a day for me. Unfortunately, I cannot find a procedure to
>> > reproduce these crashes.
[...]
> I had a crash again today with about the same backtrace as the
> one I reported in
>
> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.xemacs.beta/253071
>
> I’ll enter this in the xemacs bug tracker anon.
[...]
but it is here now:
http://tracker.xemacs.org/XEmacs/its/issue359
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=383341
Since I reported in the xemacs tracker, I had many more such
crashes. The backtrace is always the same.
CC: to Marcus Crestani <crestani(a)xemacs.org> because according to the
backtraces this seems to be related to the garbage collector.
--
Mike FABIAN <mfabian(a)suse.de> http://www.suse.de/~mfabian
睡眠不足はいい仕事の敵だ。
I � Unicode
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://calypso.tux.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta
2:46 p.m.
New subject: XEmacs 21.5 beta and FC 9 preview
Mike FABIAN wrote:
The second most annoying thing is that often the memory
consumption goes up without any apparent reason. Right
now the xemacs I am using to type this mail uses more than
a gigabyte memory:
top - 23:38:54 up 5 days, 5:21, 24 users, load average: 0.02, 0.23, 0.44
Tasks: 211 total, 2 running, 209 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie
Cpu(s): 5.3%us, 3.0%sy, 0.0%ni, 90.4%id, 1.3%wa, 0.0%hi, 0.0%si, 0.0%st
Mem: 2061292k total, 2000676k used, 60616k free, 30564k buffers
Swap: 2947876k total, 563904k used, 2383972k free, 292524k cached
PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND
23943 mfabian 20 0 1232m 1.0g 12m S 0.3 52.3 161:59.62 xemacs
Slowly increasing. And I have no idea why.
That's probably xft. This has been discussed here with respect to
Solaris SPARC as well. You should be able to search the archives for my
name to find a discussion.
Rodney
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://calypso.tux.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta
2:46 p.m.
New subject: XEmacs 21.5 beta and FC 9 preview
Rodney Sparapani wrote:
That's probably xft. This has been discussed here with respect to
Solaris SPARC as well. You should be able to search the archives for my
name to find a discussion.
Rodney
Here is the post describing similar symptoms:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.xemacs.beta/24873
And, I think Stephen had some helpful suggestions, but I can't seem to
figure out how to unroll the whole thread.
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://calypso.tux.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta
1:14 p.m.
New subject: XEmacs 21.5 beta and FC 9 preview
Rodney Sparapani <rsparapa(a)mcw.edu> さんは書きました:
Rodney Sparapani wrote:
>
> That's probably xft. This has been discussed here with respect to
> Solaris SPARC as well. You should be able to search the archives
> for my name to find a discussion.
>
> Rodney
Here is the post describing similar symptoms:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.xemacs.beta/24873
And, I think Stephen had some helpful suggestions, but I can't seem to
figure out how to unroll the whole thread.
Maybe this is the whole thread:
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.xemacs.beta/24866/focus=24873
It doesn’t see related to the problem I am seeing though.
You write:
Rodney Sparapani> it starts consuming massive amounts
Rodney Sparapani> of memory, about 1G in 30 seconds,
For me it consumes memory very slowly and not when starting XEmacs but
much later when I am already using it for hours (or maybe days if it
didn’t crash). Memory consumption slowly creeps up until my machine
starts swapping and XEmacs becomes almost unusable. Then I have to
restart it to free some memory.
--
Mike FABIAN <mfabian(a)suse.de> http://www.suse.de/~mfabian
睡眠不足はいい仕事の敵だ。
I � Unicode
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://calypso.tux.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta
3:27 p.m.
New subject: XEmacs 21.5 beta and FC 9 preview
Mike FABIAN wrote:
Rodney Sparapani <rsparapa(a)mcw.edu> さんは書きました:
Maybe this is the whole thread:
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.xemacs.beta/24866/focus=24873
It doesn’t see related to the problem I am seeing though.
You write:
Rodney Sparapani> it starts consuming massive amounts
Rodney Sparapani> of memory, about 1G in 30 seconds,
For me it consumes memory very slowly and not when starting XEmacs but
much later when I am already using it for hours (or maybe days if it
didn’t crash). Memory consumption slowly creeps up until my machine
starts swapping and XEmacs becomes almost unusable. Then I have to
restart it to free some memory.
Well, the reason that I got the big jump at the beginning is that I
foolishly loaded all of the fonts that I have on my system right away.
But, if you accumulate enough fonts over time, then the same problem
might occur. I guess this is not really all that helpful because the
"solution" on Solaris isn't known either.
Rodney
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://calypso.tux.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta
1:37 p.m.
New subject: XEmacs 21.5 beta and FC 9 preview
Rodney Sparapani <rsparapa(a)mcw.edu> さんは書きました:
Mike FABIAN wrote:
> Rodney Sparapani <rsparapa(a)mcw.edu> さんは書きました:
>
> Maybe this is the whole thread:
>
> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.xemacs.beta/24866/focus=24873
>
> It doesn’t see related to the problem I am seeing though.
>
> You write:
>
> Rodney Sparapani> it starts consuming massive amounts
> Rodney Sparapani> of memory, about 1G in 30 seconds,
>
> For me it consumes memory very slowly and not when starting XEmacs but
> much later when I am already using it for hours (or maybe days if it
> didn’t crash). Memory consumption slowly creeps up until my machine
> starts swapping and XEmacs becomes almost unusable. Then I have to
> restart it to free some memory.
>
Well, the reason that I got the big jump at the beginning is that I
foolishly loaded all of the fonts that I have on my system right away.
How did you do that?
But, if you accumulate enough fonts over time, then the same problem
might occur. I guess this is not really all that helpful because the
"solution" on Solaris isn't known either.
--
Mike FABIAN <mfabian(a)suse.de> http://www.suse.de/~mfabian
睡眠不足はいい仕事の敵だ。
I � Unicode
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://calypso.tux.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta
2:14 p.m.
New subject: XEmacs 21.5 beta and FC 9 preview
Mike FABIAN <mfabian(a)suse.de> さんは書きました:
Rodney Sparapani <rsparapa(a)mcw.edu> さんは書きました:
> Mike FABIAN wrote:
>> Rodney Sparapani <rsparapa(a)mcw.edu> さんは書きました:
>>
>> Maybe this is the whole thread:
>>
>> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.xemacs.beta/24866/focus=24873
>>
>> It doesn’t see related to the problem I am seeing though.
>>
>> You write:
>>
>> Rodney Sparapani> it starts consuming massive amounts
>> Rodney Sparapani> of memory, about 1G in 30 seconds,
>>
>> For me it consumes memory very slowly and not when starting XEmacs but
>> much later when I am already using it for hours (or maybe days if it
>> didn’t crash). Memory consumption slowly creeps up until my machine
>> starts swapping and XEmacs becomes almost unusable. Then I have to
>> restart it to free some memory.
>>
>
> Well, the reason that I got the big jump at the beginning is that I
> foolishly loaded all of the fonts that I have on my system right away.
How did you do that?
I ask because I would like to try whether I can reproduce it.
Currently I don’t know how to reproduce the increasing memory
consumption. It just “happens sometimes” if I am using XEmacs for a long
time.
--
Mike FABIAN <mfabian(a)suse.de> http://www.suse.de/~mfabian
睡眠不足はいい仕事の敵だ。
I � Unicode
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://calypso.tux.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta
2:49 p.m.
New subject: XEmacs 21.5 beta and FC 9 preview
Mike FABIAN wrote:
Mike FABIAN <mfabian(a)suse.de> さんは書きました:
>>>
>> Well, the reason that I got the big jump at the beginning is that I
>> foolishly loaded all of the fonts that I have on my system right away.
> How did you do that?
I ask because I would like to try whether I can reproduce it.
Currently I don’t know how to reproduce the increasing memory
consumption. It just “happens sometimes” if I am using XEmacs for a long
time.
That is described in
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.xemacs.beta/24873
For Solaris, there is no /usr/share/fonts. So, I made that a symlink to
where all of my fonts are. But, there are quite a large number in the
actual directory that I linked to. And, I think, that is why it starts
consuming large amounts of memory. However, xft xemacs was pretty
unstable for me, so it could have been something else. Lots of crashes.
Rodney
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://calypso.tux.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta
6:09 p.m.
New subject: XEmacs 21.5 beta and FC 9 preview
Rodney Sparapani <rsparapa(a)mcw.edu> さんは書きました:
Mike FABIAN wrote:
> Mike FABIAN <mfabian(a)suse.de> さんは書きました:
>>>>
>>> Well, the reason that I got the big jump at the beginning is that I
>>> foolishly loaded all of the fonts that I have on my system right away.
>> How did you do that?
>
> I ask because I would like to try whether I can reproduce it.
>
> Currently I don’t know how to reproduce the increasing memory
> consumption. It just “happens sometimes” if I am using XEmacs for a long
> time.
>
That is described in
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.xemacs.beta/24873
For Solaris, there is no /usr/share/fonts. So, I made that a
symlink
to where all of my fonts are. But, there are quite a large number in
the actual directory that I linked to. And, I think, that is why it
starts consuming large amounts of memory.
I did read your post in the archive but it didn’t seem to apply to me.
On my linux system there is a /usr/share/fonts directory with several
sub-directories which all together contain a huge amount of fonts:
mfabian＠magellan:~$ fc-list : file | wc
3413 3683 138337
mfabian＠magellan:~$
I.e. I have 3413 font files installed. The /usr/share/fonts/truetype
directory alone contains 909 font files:
mfabian＠magellan:~$ fc-list : file | grep usr/share/fonts/truetype | wc
909 912 38611
mfabian＠magellan:~$
Nevertheless, XEmacs doesn’t consume huge amounts of memory while
starting but only much later when I am already using if for many hours
or even days.
However, xft xemacs was pretty unstable for me, so it could have
been
something else. Lots of crashes.
I have lots of crashes as well but all of them seem to be in the new
garbage collector, always the same backtrace:
http://tracker.xemacs.org/XEmacs/its/issue359
--
Mike FABIAN <mfabian(a)suse.de> http://www.suse.de/~mfabian
睡眠不足はいい仕事の敵だ。
I � Unicode
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://calypso.tux.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta
5832
days inactive
5845
days old
15 comments
5 participants
participants (5)
-
Jerry James -
Mike FABIAN -
Mike Kupfer -
Rodney Sparapani -
Stephen J. Turnbull